Tuesday, October 30, 2007

Year in Review, Part 1: Work

I've been craving a reason to write something slightly brainier than "Here's a picture of my cute daughter!", but let's be honest; most of my brain is, in fact, occupied with All Things Lea. That's just the way it is. So, a compromise: I'm going to spend the next month or so reflecting on where I was a year ago, and what has changed since then-- for me, my family, and the little creature who has changed all of us so profoundly. I'm also hoping to do some deeper thinking about some bigger issues relating to motherhood and childcare.

Part of the reason Big Changes are so heavy on my mind right now is because just last week when I was in Pennsylvania, I went in to visit my old place of work at Habitat Philadelphia, and realized that it's been just about exactly a year since my last day of work. October 28th, 2006 was the last day I got up in the morning and went to work. Wow. I have officially had ZERO income for a year now.

Here's something funny: I remember when I was in 8th grade, I was in a community theatre production of "A Midsummer Night's Dream." I was having a discussion with another girl in the play, Lauren, about our future goals. She said, "Well, I only have two things I know for sure I definitely want to do sometime in the future: play Maria in West Side Story and get married." I surprised myself by answering "Hey! All I want to do is play ________ in ________ and get married!" (Who knows the answer?)

But wait. Let me clarify. I don't mean to say that at 14 years old, I thought the key to my future fulfillment was simply to find a husband and rock the best non-dancing female lead in all of musical theatre. I knew I would want to do other things, including to pursue some kind of professional career. But the question then, as now, remains: what?

I'm trying not to put a ton of pressure on myself to figure it all out real quickly, but I must say that having a child complicates things in a huge way. There are some days when I kind of think that if I had established myself on a definite career path pre-Lea, I would be itching to re-enter that path right about NOW. She's less mom-dependent, physically and otherwise, and I'm starting to feel a certain brain atrophy. I miss being challenged intellectually and working with other adults. I miss problem-solving.

Then there are other days when I can't imagine myself committing long-term to any career that will make it distinctly challenging to be present, emotionally and physically, for the huge variety of things my child might need me for. A few weeks ago I found myself weeping to Brian that I want to be able to make Lea's Cogsworth costume for her sixth grade play like my mother did for me. (Actually, let's put it out there: I hope Lea gets to be Belle, dammit.) How will I do that if I'm a nurse-midwife or a fulltime teacher? Or, um, anything really? How would I possibly be able to find time for big projects like that when I am so easily undone by a hectic schedule, and an array of demands on my time as simple as basic housework? I know it can be done, of course; I've seen it done. It's just daunting.

Here's another thing I've been mulling: childcare. Let's discuss my Number One Gripe with my otherwise beloved feminist movement: the devaluing of childcare. I don't like it. I don't like that there are still feminist leaders like Linda Hirshman out there saying that an educated woman who chooses to be a full-time parent is an affront to the whole cause. That's BS. Here's why: somebody has to care for all these children. The work must be done. If you're going to imply that the work is beneath degree-holding women (by saying, like Hirshman, that "an educated, competent adult's place is in the office")-- that they owe it to the world to do something "more"-- then what are you saying about the people (women, 99% of the time) who make their living doing childcare? I guess they're an affront as well, because the work is so lowly, right? Or are those women who work as daycare providers to be excluded from the feminist movement altogether because their place of work is a nursery, not an office? Or what?

It makes me think of one particular bit of my favorite recent read, Barbara Kingsolver's Animal, Vegetable, Miracle, which chronicles the Kingsolver family's quest to eat only locally-grown and -raised foods for one year, and along with that, to put a finger on just what America's "food culture" is. Let me sidestep the issue of childcare to let Kingsolver make my point for me as she discusses a similar post-feminist issue: food.


"I belong to the generation of women who took as our youthful rallying cry: Allow us a good education so we won't have to slave in the kitchen. We recoiled from the proposition that keeping a husband presentable and fed should be our highest intellectual aspiration. We went to school, sweated those exams, earned our professional stripes...

... It's a reasonable proposition. But it got twisted into a pathological food culture. When my generation of women walked away from the kitchen we were escorted down that path by a profiteering industry that knew a tired, vulnerable marketing target when they saw it. "Hey, ladies," it said to us, "go ahead, get liberated. We'll take care of dinner." They threw open the door and we walked into a nutritional crisis and genuinely toxic food supply...

... When we traded homemaking for careers, we were implicitly promised economic independence and worldly influence. But a devil of a bargain it has turned out to be in terms of daily life. We gave up the aroma of warm bread rising, the measured pace of nurturing routines, the creative task of molding our families' tastes and zest for life; we received in exchange the minivan and the Lunchable. I consider it the great hoodwink of my generation. "


A hoodwink it is: in order to convince the world that women should have options beyond homekeeping, certain thinkers of the feminist movement (which, let me reiterate that it is one that I place tremendous value in) have taken the route of devaluing the work that must be done to keep people clothed and fed and nurtured. And I find this sad, and I find myself constantly apologizing-- with my tone of voice or a shrug or the hurried way I answer the question "What do you do?"-- for work that I know is vital to a functional society.

Kingsolver laments the pathological food culture she sees all around her. I am very glad to say that I do not think our child-rearing culture is in nearly such dire straits, and that I do see creative solutions to the childcare/feminism conundrum. But for some families, the solution is going to be a mother who serves as a full-time parent, sometimes for 2 months, sometimes for 20 years. And I want that to be okay, not just for my own comfort every time I engage in small-talk, but because I think that the right way to approach this as a feminist is to embrace a tradition where every woman-- and man-- can evaluate the options available to them without seeing child-rearing as a pursuit less meaningful or less worthy than the rest.

That said, I will repeat: I miss using higher-order thinking skills. I go absolutely wild for a project that will require some creative problem solving (do you remember the fervor with which I described my solutions to our plumbing and flea emergencies? It felt good to tackle something that demanded a bit of planning and cleverness on my part). Baby-care is mundane. But the real sticking point is that it is often simultaneously totally predictable and impossible to plan around. What I mean is, most days consist of a pretty limited variety of activities: take short walks. read board books. play with blocks. plop Lea in pack-n-play with wooden spoon while I cook. go outside and grab leaves. stroll laps through Target. But in spite of the predictability, it's very hard to know ahead of time what I will be doing at, say, 2:30 tomorrow afternoon. Plans are constantly changing if Lea is cranky or hyper or tired, or if we got stuck in traffic earlier and she already spent way too much time in her carseat, or if she has a runny nose and time outdoors seems like a bad idea. The goals are (in order of priority): to keep her happy and stimulated, keep me sane, and if possible, keep the house somewhat clean (please note that this is a very distant third for me).

It's challenging in ways going to an office every day never was. I go long stretches of time not speaking to another adult, and I can't tell you how much I would love to be able to take a 15-minute tea break twice a day like I used to. And I miss having a paycheck and a little more financial freedom. But I love being here to try to interpret Lea's increasingly-language-like babbling, and to watch her study textures and make sense of books. I love policing Lea/cat encounters ("gentle! be gentle!"), and taking her to story time at the library. What I really love right now is having the time to continue to breastfeed without the logistical nightmare of pumping and storing, to make pretty nutritious meals, to save money by using cloth diapers, to walk around our beautiful town, and in general, to feel like we're living a decently healthy life. I like the pace of my life in a lot of ways, and I think a lot of these things would be much harder to do if getting myself to and from a job, and getting Lea to and from daycare, were added to the mix.

So here I am, smack in the middle of life as a stay-at-home mother, and wondering what's next. I literally do not stop thinking about these questions, evaluating the possibilities for how I may or may not pursue a profession sometime in the next few years. I guess that's the second hoodwink at play here: the self-reflection that can be so inescapable when you feel pulled towards two paths that seem unavoidably divergent. Maybe I underestimate myself. Maybe I underestimate all women, I don't know. Do I need to turn in my feminist card now?

Whatever. I'm keeping it. It doesn't feel like a contradiction in terms to vehemently defend my choice of a current job as well as my right to choose something else whenever it makes sense for me and my family. And I suppose it's fitting that I close with a sentiment echoed by every feminist before me: may it be just a little bit easier for my daughter.

11 comments:

E.S.C. said...

Baker's Wife in Into the Woods.

And amen/go-get-'em to the rest.

Holly Cummings said...

Apparently you can do both (career and mom). Or so I was told when I had my own what's going on / what am i going to do post a few weeks ago. I'm still not convinced. But I don't know what the better alternative is.

In the meantime, rest assured that there are plenty of women (and men) who envy you in your stay-at-home-parent-ness. But if you're feeling stir crazy now, I would recommend an outside job/hobby/peer group network, if only so you don't end up like some other women I know, with children all raised and no idea what to do with your life when they don't need/want daily mothering anymore. And you don't like housecleaning. :)

Annie said...

Yes yes yes!

Our children are only little once and it might put a lot of our passions/hobbies/interests on hold or at least in slow-motion, but these early years will be gone before we know it. And in the meantime, being the main care provider for your own child tends to bring a lot of new passions and interests into your life.

Anonymous said...

Wow! Thanks for a host of wonderful thoughts. I love your "both-and" honesty in claiming what you love and what is challenging re a full time parenting career and a career in other venues... Reminded me of the conversation we had in your kitchen last summer...

In recent weeks I have felt hugely connected with you through two experiences - Now may be a good time to share them. The first was as I read a book for a women's study group of which I have just become a part. The book is called Midwives of an Unnamed Future: Women's Spirituality in Times of Unprecedented Change by Broz and Flynn. You became the model for me and one of the lenses through which I experience the book and the group. The other was just a couple of weeks ago when I was gathering materials in Target, Michael's and the fabric store for my Mother Earth Halloween costume - It was such a fun and creative afternoon, and again, I thought of you and your skill at creating baby carriers, covering sofas, pillows, etc. There is great value and goodness in what you are doing and in anything that you will choose to do at any point in your life! The treasure is who you are.

One of the things I am trying to practice as I struggle with all of the issues you raised, is to be as attentive as I can in any given moment to what I can experience and learn that will help me be most fully who I am and a faithful companion to those with whom I share the path... What you have said here articulates what many of us experience - you are definitely not alone, and I could be more thankful for you and the life you are living.

Anonymous said...

oops - last sentence is of course, I could NOT be more thankful...

PCJ said...

Thanks for the comments, all.

Holly, I keep holding out hope that one of these days my nesting instinct will kick in. It never happened when I was pregnant, so maybe it just has a far longer gestation period than the actual baby did. Yeah right. If I'm being honest, I know I'm probably destined to a life of 100% begrudging vacuuming.

As for the envy thing: I don't know. I am always a little bit perplexed when someone says they envy my ability to stay home. What do they envy, exactly? The fact that I was in a job that didn't make a lot of sense to return to post-baby? Because other than that, my decision to leave work was not exactly a matter of chance or circumstance or wealth-- it's mostly a matter of how we prioritized. For us, we decided that the non-negotiable was for me to stay home for at least a year or two, and we knew that would mean sacrifices. To make it happen, we sacrificed (1) the ability to save money, take fun vacations, and spend pretty freely, (2) the proximity to family-- moving 500 miles to make it a financial possibility, and (3) the continuity of my career journey. I suspect that many people (not all- certainly not single parents or those facing serious financial hardship) just have different non-negotiables, ya know? For one woman I know, the non-negotiable was to be able to afford private school, and that tipped the scales in favor of her return to work. So yeah, I can absolutely understand what a single mom or someone in poverty might envy-- we have no debt, and that's largely a function of the privilege we were born into-- but I also get it a lot from people who are simply prioritizing differently, which I think is what you were getting at with your "what to do?" post before-- what is the priority going to be? Obviously it's a confusing thing to talk about because children are of course the priority in almost every sense of the word, hands down. So when I say that some people "choose their career [or education, or financial freedom, or adult interaction] as the priority," that might sound like a slight-- I wish there were another way to word it to reflect that I don't consider such a choice to be an unfeeling or unmotherly one (again, self-interest at play here as I contemplate a future where I AM working full-time with young children at home.)

Annie, it's so very true that simply having a child can change your interests and passions. Something else I meant to post about was my endless hand-wringing over whether my interest in midwifery is a bad sign that my identity is becoming way too wrapped up in having given birth. I've just decided to give myself a break on that front and acknowledge that having a baby has changed innumerable things about me, and if one of those things is my career path, so what? If I had the profound experience of finding a dinosaur bone and was so moved and intrigued, I decided to study paleontology, I wouldn't give myself a hard time for letting one experience consume me. What makes having a baby any different?

Mary, thanks for the kind words! I'm afraid you overestimate my sewing ability! I think the very short list of projects you mentioned pretty much sums up my prowess in that area (although I will add the sofa-covering project to the list of ones that functioned as an exercise in brain-power as much as necessary home-maintenance.)

I like what you say about attentiveness to the given moment, and it's something I'm definitely trying to focus on too. In particular, I'm trying very hard to quiet my frenzied "figure-it-out-ness" for now, and have confidence that when the time is right to move on to something new, I will know it.

Eric, you're right, of course.

BookBabe said...

Funny that I just sent you a link to a book about mothers writing. You pretty much nail the dilemma. Women can be each other's best friends or their worst enemies when it comes to judging choices. I remember feeling pretty darned worthless when I wasn't being what I considered productive. I was fortunate to find a job that allowed me to take my kids with me much of the time and do a lot of the work at night at home or when someone was around to babysit. It was important to me to be available, and, yes, making that Cogsworth costume was a big deal for me, too.

And it IS criminal that our society so undervalues the work of caregivers of both your youngest and oldest citizens. I am sickened by the huge compensation given to people doing jobs that, in the long run, benefit only a few. Educators and other professions that help people? Psshh! What in the world do THEY contribute to the GNP?

I feel for you - and I know it doesn't help to hear your mother tell you that you'll have plenty of choices. I just couldn't believe that at the time - my world seemed so limited. But I will never regret that we could arrange things so that we spent the maximum time together. Having a peer group of women in the same boat helped - as you expand your circle of friends, you won't feel so alone.

And as you have already recognized, everyday family life does lend itself to problem solving. I remember you and I doing some house projects that gave us tremendous satisfaction, don't you? So you can bring Lea into examining possible solutions to situations as she grows - such an empowering thing to do for a daughter.

WOMEN RULE!!!!!!

BookBabe said...

Oh, and about the vacuuming thing? I take full responsibility for not making it the kind of fun it should be. As you know, I have a thirty-year-old vacuum cleaner that has only had about 17 years of use! But when the spirit moves...

I was also thinking about your food comparison - that is right on the money, too. You have raised my awareness to the extent that I am kind of sickened by ANY TV ad for processed food - I want to throw something through the screen whenever a Lunchables commercial comes on! The women in our family (you, me, Holly) do take some creative pleasure into making good food when we can, and I don't feel the least bit put upon by having to make the effort. I do admit, though, to loving the bagged salad - a little extravagance I allow myself. But I truly love pulling out the food processor and making something out of quality ingredients and my own labor.

Part of me DOES understand the frustration of some professional women who have made the choice to make career number one and find themselves on the wrong end of sexist workplace decision makers who assume that ALL women will leave to have children or won't devote the amount of time and energy to the job as a man (married or not, parent or not) will. But the enemy is NOT the full or part time stay at home mom - it's that beknighted, chauvinistic decision makers (sadly, not only men, but also women who need to prove they have, well, you know, something God did not give them) who classify all women AND men into 1950s pigeonholes. And I feel for the fathers who are looked upon with disdain for sacrificing to spend time with their kids.

Enough. This is your blog (Shut up, Mom!)

PCJ said...

You know, I have spent the last couple days thinking of that end of things too; the fact that those assumptions (employers hesitating to hire young women, for instance) are still so prevalent, and how that can make life so challenging. I don't mean to minimize that. In fact, when it comes down to it, the burden I bear is mostly just feeling judged from time to time, and I know that doesn't compare to the burden many women bear trying to navigate a still-very-sexist workplace. So I hope my comments don't come across as "all this progress has actually been a bad thing because it means people think I'm dumb." I wish people didn't think of me (or any other stay-at-home parent) as dumb, or lazy, or whatever. It stinks. But I wouldn't change history to make that happen, not by a long shot.

I think it's very telling that mothers at both extremes can be made to feel absolutely terrible about themselves.

Holly Cummings said...

well, i had a whole comment written out, and i lost it. maybe i'll find the energy to redo it tomorrow.

Holly Cummings said...

"As for the envy thing: I don't know. I am always a little bit perplexed when someone says they envy my ability to stay home. What do they envy, exactly? The fact that I was in a job that didn't make a lot of sense to return to post-baby?"

I think you underestimate the power of that kind of job. It's great to aspire to become a doctor, lawyer, engineer, or whatever, but education costs money. Even if I decided to "re-prioritize" (which I'll argue later is not the reality of the situation) and become a stay-at-home mom, I'm screwed, because I owe $300,000 for my education. Who's going to pay that back if I don't work? I need to win the lottery or marry rich. (Actually, when I graduate I'm expected to buy disability insurance so that even if I get in a horrible car accident and become unable to practice medicine, my loans will still be repaid.) So because of a decision I made at 6 to become a doctor, one I didn't decide against at 18, and a decision not to look primarily for a rich husband, I'm stuck working for the rest of my life (well, at least 15-25 years before I'm free of the debt). Yes, my paycheck is going to be pretty good, but so is my debt load.

So that means if I want to have children before I'm 40, I have to be able to deal with my debt as well, which isn't really a priority as much as a necessity. So in a lot of ways, yes, I would consider you lucky. You graduated college debt-free, you didn't accrue any more debt in the face of working, and you have a husband who makes enough to support the both of you (and now the three of you), granted, with sacrifices. But your decision about whether to go back to work is (from what you've said, anyway) more about the pros/cons of being a working mother, and not about the finances of the big stuff, which makes it about priorities, just like the woman who wants to send her kids to private school, and not about non-negotiables, like having $300,000 + accruing interest hanging over your head making you work.

So the "privelege [you] were born into" plays a lot more into your ability to be a stay-at-home mom than I think you're giving it credit for. One could imagine someone else very similar to you who graduated college with $100,000 of loans, and I don't think the decision to stay at home would be so much about the priorities as the necessities. That's why so many women can take only 6 weeks of maternity leave; even if you move to a less-expensive place to live and cancel the cable, there are still bills to pay, and either you or your husband has to pay them.

I think the only place I agree with you is that I chose education as my priority. But like I said, I essentially made that decision when I was 6, then decided that as a modern-day feminist I didn't need a husband who made more money than I do, decided to look for a husband I was compatible with rather than a husband who wanted to be a stay-at-home dad, and now I'm apparently stuck when the thought pops into my head that I might someday want kids. So what's the real difference between a single mom with latchkey kids and me, who may have latchkey kids that come home to a babysitter? I guess my kids won't burn the house down, but that mom and I will have just as little contact with our kids.

Anyway, all I'm saying is that you shouldn't be perplexed when someone who isn't stone-cold poor says they envy you. There's a lot to envy. I guess your double-guessing the compliment come from society's damnation of child-rearing or whatever, like you said.

And none of this is supposed to sound harsh, or slighting you and your thoughts, either. I think Eric's right, and blog comments are not the best place to discuss these sorts of life problems.

Also, I agree with your midwifery/paleontology analogy. It's no different than if you thought you were going to be an architect your whole life, then got in a car accident and were so inspired by your doctors that you changed your career path. (Sorry, doctor career stories are the only ones I know, and that's a common one on med school applications.) No need to give yourself so much grief about it. And I don't mean to imply that baby = car accident, either :)